Current:Home > StocksA federal judge has ruled that Dodge City’s elections don’t discriminate against Latinos -SecureNest Finance
A federal judge has ruled that Dodge City’s elections don’t discriminate against Latinos
View
Date:2025-04-11 13:16:33
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that a Latino majority’s voting rights aren’t violated by the election system in the former Wild West town in Kansas that inspired the long-running television series “Gunsmoke.”
U.S. District Judge Eric Melgren concluded that Dodge City’s practice of electing all five of its city commissioners at large does not prevent candidates backed by Latino voters from holding office. He issued his decision Wednesday evening in a lawsuit filed in 2022 by two Latino residents who argued that the system is discriminatory and violated both the U.S. Constitution and the landmark 1965 federal Voting Rights Act.
The two residents, Miguel Coca and Alejandro Rangel-Lopez, argued that the city should be required to have each commissioner elected from a separate district. About 64% of the city’s 27,000 residents are Latino, and it’s possible that Latinos would be a majority of residents in three of five single-member districts.
Their lawsuit argued that the city hadn’t elected a Latino commissioner since at least 2000, though a commissioner serving in 2022 said he is Latino. Melgren concluded that a review of local elections since 2014 showed that candidates backed by the highest percentages of Latino voters, including non-Latino ones, won “at least half of the time.”
“The Court cannot conclude that white bloc voting prevents Latino-preferred candidates from being elected most of the time,” Melgren wrote.
Dodge City, about 320 miles (515 kilometers) southwest of Kansas City, Missouri, draws thousands of tourists each year because of its wild history in the 1870s and early 1880s and the images of saloons, cowboys and gunfights created by the stories about fictional U.S. Marshal Matt Dillon in “Gunsmoke” in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. It’s also home to a state-owned casino.
Growth in the meatpacking industry in southwestern Kansas transformed the area by drawing job-seeking immigrants. Seven of the eight Kansas communities identified by the 2020 U.S. census as majority Latino are in the region.
The city issued a statement Thursday saying that Melgren’s ruling “recognizes our effort to represent everyone who makes Dodge City their home” and said the city commission seeks to build “a stronger, more vibrant, and diverse community where all viewpoints are valued.”
“It is unfortunate that we have spent significant taxpayer dollars to defend our position, taking away from our ability to utilize the funds to make our community better,” the statement said.
The two residents’ attorneys said they presented “clear evidence” that the system violated the Voting Rights Act. Their legal team included the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas, the ACLU’s national Voting Rights Project and UCLA’s Voting Rights Project.
“We are currently exploring next steps in this case and will continue to work for a truly representative democracy that ensures Latino voters can have their voices heard in Dodge City,” they said in a statement Thursday.
The ACLU also sued the top local elections official in 2018 after she moved Dodge City’s only polling site outside of the city. The suit argued that doing so made it more difficult for Latino residents who often rely on public transportation to vote. The lawsuit was dismissed after the elections clerk agreed to maintain two polling sites for future elections.
Melgren did conclude that Coca and Rangel-Lopez showed that Dodge City’s Latino population is large enough and concentrated enough in certain parts of the city to control at least one hypothetical commission district. An expert presented 14 proposed maps in which Latinos were a majority in three of the five districts.
The judge also concluded that the plaintiffs also showed that Latinos in Dodge City “vote in significant numbers for the same candidates.”
But Melgren noted that a test set decades ago by the U.S. Supreme Court required the two Dodge City residents to demonstrate that Latino voters “usually” cannot elect candidates they prefer.
veryGood! (492)
Related
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Missouri high school teacher put on leave over porn site: I knew this day was coming
- Wind power project in New Jersey would be among farthest off East Coast, company says
- Black man’s 1845 lynching in downtown Indianapolis recounted with historical marker
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes bill that would give striking workers unemployment pay
- Tamar Braxton and Fiancé JR Robinson Break Up
- Brain surgery left TOKiMONSTA unable to understand music. Now every song is precious
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- The military is turning to microgrids to fight global threats — and global warming
Ranking
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes bill that would give striking workers unemployment pay
- Brain surgery left TOKiMONSTA unable to understand music. Now every song is precious
- OCD affects millions of Americans. What causes it?
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- Who is Jenny in 'Forrest Gump'? What to know about the cast of the cinema classic.
- Simone Biles inspires millions of girls. Now one is going to worlds with her
- Man who sought to expose sexual predators fatally shot during argument in Detroit-area restaurant
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
'Paw Patrol 2' is top dog at box office with $23M debut, 'Saw X' creeps behind
Spain’s king begins a new round of talks in search of a candidate to form government
Proof Dakota Johnson and Chris Martin's Romance Is Pure Magic
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
Supreme Court declines to take up appeal from John Eastman involving emails sought by House Jan. 6 select committee
A former Family Feud contestant convicted of wife's murder speaks out: I'm innocent. I didn't kill Becky.
A former Family Feud contestant convicted of wife's murder speaks out: I'm innocent. I didn't kill Becky.