Current:Home > reviewsMassachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy" -SecureNest Finance
Massachusetts lawmakers target "affirmative action for the wealthy"
View
Date:2025-04-17 22:12:41
So-called legacy college admissions — or giving preference to the children of alumni — is coming under new scrutiny following the Supreme Court's ruling last week that scraps the use of affirmative action to pick incoming students.
Lawmakers in Massachusetts are proposing a new fee that would be levied on the state's colleges and universities that use legacy preferences when admitting students, including Harvard University and Williams College, a highly ranked small liberal arts college. Any money raised by the fee would then be used to fund community colleges within the state.
The proposed law comes as a civil rights group earlier this month sued Harvard over legacy admissions at the Ivy League school, alleging the practice discriminates against students of color by giving an unfair advantage to the mostly White children of alumni. Harvard and Williams declined to comment on the proposed legislation.
Highly ranked schools such as Harvard have long relied on admissions strategies that, while legal, are increasingly sparking criticism for giving a leg up to mostly White, wealthy students. Legacy students, the children of faculty and staff, recruited athletes and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of the White students admitted to Harvard, a 2019 study found.
"Legacy preference, donor preference and binding decision amount to affirmative action for the wealthy," Massachusetts Rep. Simon Cataldo, one of the bill's co-sponsors, told CBS MoneyWatch.
The Massachusetts lawmakers would also fine colleges that rely on another strategy often criticized as providing an unfair advantage to students from affluent backgrounds: early-decision applications, or when students apply to a school before the general admissions round.
Early decision usually has a higher acceptance rate than the general admissions pool, but it typically draws wealthier applicants
because early applicants may not know how much financial aid they could receive before having to decide on whether to attend.
Because Ivy League colleges now routinely cost almost $90,000 a year, it's generally the children of the very rich who can afford to apply for early decision.
"At highly selective schools, the effect of these policies is to elevate the admissions chances of wealthy students above higher-achieving students who don't qualify as a legacy or donor prospect, or who need to compare financial aid packages before committing to a school," Cataldo said.
$100 million from Harvard
The proposed fee as part of the bill would be levied on the endowments of colleges and universities that rely on such strategies. Cataldo estimated that the law would generate over $120 million in Massachusetts each year, with $100 million of that stemming from Harvard.
That's because Harvard has a massive endowment of $50.9 billion, making it one of the nation's wealthiest institutions of higher education. In 2020, the university had the largest endowment in the U.S., followed by Yale and the University of Texas college system, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
Not all colleges allow legacy admissions. Some institutions have foresworn the practice, including another Massachusetts institution, MIT. The tech-focused school also doesn't use binding early decision.
"Just to be clear: we don't do legacy," MIT said in an admissions blog post that it points to as explaining its philosophy. "[W]e simply don't care if your parents (or aunt, or grandfather, or third cousin) went to MIT."
It added, "So to be clear: if you got into MIT, it's because you got into MIT. Simple as that."
"Good actors" in higher education, like MIT, wouldn't be impacted by the proposed fee, Cataldo noted.
- In:
- College
veryGood! (454)
Related
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- In Florida, DeSantis May End the Battle Over Rooftop Solar With a Pen Stroke
- The Largest U.S. Grid Operator Puts 1,200 Mostly Solar Projects on Hold for Two Years
- Germany’s New Government Had Big Plans on Climate, Then Russia Invaded Ukraine. What Happens Now?
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Shay Mitchell's Barbie Transformation Will Make You Do a Double Take
- Inside Clean Energy: Explaining the Record-Breaking Offshore Wind Sale
- 'This is a compromise': How the White House is defending the debt ceiling bill
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- ‘Timber Cities’ Might Help Decarbonize the World
Ranking
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Nearly 200 Countries Approve a Biodiversity Accord Enshrining Human Rights and the ‘Rights of Nature’
- Inside Clean Energy: Explaining the Record-Breaking Offshore Wind Sale
- Proposed EU Nature Restoration Law Could be the First Big Step Toward Achieving COP15’s Ambitious Plan to Staunch Biodiversity Loss
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Occidental is Eyeing California’s Clean Fuels Market to Fund Texas Carbon Removal Plant
- Da Brat Gives Birth to First Baby With Wife Jesseca Judy Harris-Dupart
- Drifting Toward Disaster: the (Second) Rio Grande
Recommendation
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Q&A: How White Flight and Environmental Injustice Led to the Jackson, Mississippi Water Crisis
Can ChatGPT write a podcast episode? Can AI take our jobs?
‘We’re Losing Our People’
Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
Texas Is Now the Nation’s Biggest Emitter of Toxic Substances Into Streams, Rivers and Lakes
Olivia Rodrigo's Celebrity Crush Confession Will Take You Back to the Glory Days