Current:Home > StocksColorado to release gray wolves: Here's when, where and why. -SecureNest Finance
Colorado to release gray wolves: Here's when, where and why.
TradeEdge Exchange View
Date:2025-04-08 06:45:48
DENVER ‒ Colorado officially launches a controversial experiment next month: State officials will release up to 10 gray wolves as mandated by a 2020 state law that unleashed proverbial howls of protest from opponents.
Wolves have long been a divisive species, particularly in rural areas where many farmers and ranchers consider them an unacceptable risk to both humans and livestock. But for many Americans, they evoke a powerful and meaningful emotional connection with wild places and the natural world.
In keeping with that divide, Colorado voters barely approved the wolves' reintroduction, and the law received most of its support from liberal urban residents living far from where the wolves will be released.
Colorado is planning to release dozens of wolves captured from Oregon over time, with officials hoping that will be enough to ultimately create self-sustaining packs totaling 150-200 animals.
While many other western states today have healthy wolf populations, Colorado is home to only a handful of wild wolves after the species was largely exterminated nationally by the 1940s. Due to their near-elimination, wolves were among the first animals protected by the 1973 Endangered Species Act, which obligated the federal government to try restoring them to the landscape.
"The return of the wolf to Colorado has the potential to be an historic ecological success..." Michael Saul, Rockies and Plains field director for Defenders of Wildlife, said in a statement.
What's so controversial about wolves?
Backers of Colorado's reintroduction plan say that wolves are a natural and important part of the ecosystem in the West, and that humans had no right to exterminate them. They argue that safety concerns are wildly overblown, and that ranchers and farmers who lose livestock will be fairly compensated by taxpayers.
But farmers and ranchers consider wolves a dangerous threat to wildlife and stock alike. A single adult wolf can kill and eat as many as 20 elk annually, and ranchers worry they'll have to spend more protecting their cows and sheep, cutting into their already-thin margins.
Federal officials began relocating Canadian wolves into Yellowstone National Park in the mid-1990s, and then to other western states a decade later. Long-running court battles among the states, wildlife defenders, the federal government and other parties have complicated relocation and management efforts.
Today, wolves in the Lower 48 are protected from hunting under a 2022 federal court order that overruled a Trump administration decision to let state agencies permit people to hunt wolves in some states. Following that Trump decision, state officials in Montana, Wyoming and Idaho killed 20 wolves that stepped outside Yellowstone National Park.
Congress is currently considering a measure proposed by Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, a Republican, to overturn that court decision and give control back to the states so hunters can kill wolves if state officials conclude there are too many living in an area.
Colorado had to get special permission from the federal government to create and manage the new wolf pack. The existing wild wolves in the state likely moved down from Wyoming, according to officials, with evidence they have been breeding.
Where are the Colorado wolves coming from?
After approaching multiple other states, Colorado officials persuaded their counterparts in Oregon to let them trap and relocate up to 10 wolves this year. The wolves will be tranquilized, screened for diseases, tooth decay and other potential problems. The captured wolves chosen for relocation will be 1-5 years old, and both male and female. They will be trucked or flown to Colorado in "sturdy aluminum crates" before being released, wearing GPS trackers.
Several states refused to give Colorado wolves, in part because many conservative-led states generally oppose seeing wolf populations grow. Wyoming and Utah officials are worried that Colorado's new wolves will ignore state borders, and have already signaled they want Colorado to pay if the new wolves kill their livestock.
Colorado now plans to release up to 50 wolves captured from Oregon
“We are deeply grateful for Oregon’s partnership in this endeavor, and we are now one step closer to fulfilling the will of the voters in time,” Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said in a press release.
Where are the Colorado wolves being released?
The exact locations will be kept secret, but the wolves will generally be released on state or private land in a rural area of west-central Colorado. Officials who selected the release area considered the nearby human population and its political support for wolves, and access to prey animals like elk and deer. It's also far from borders with Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico, and tribal lands in southwest Colorado.
Specifically, the area generally includes the cities of Aspen, Gunnison and Glenwood Springs, but is otherwise largely rural with relatively few cattle or sheep ranches. The wolves are not being released onto federal land, although they will likely end up on it: 36% of Colorado is federal property.
A study from the 1995 wolf reintroductions in Yellowstone National Park found the animals moved as far as 140 miles from their release point, although most remained within 50 miles of the dropoff point. Federal officials say those newly introduced wolves killed 256 sheep and 41 cows on nearby ranches in the first eight years after their reintroduction to the park.
In 2021, wolves living in northern Colorado killed a 500-pound cow ‒ the first documented wolf kill of livestock in Colorado in at least 70 years.
veryGood! (48)
Related
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- 43 Malaysians were caught in a phone scam operation in Peru and rescued from human traffickers
- Is Indigenous Peoples' Day a federal holiday? What to know about commemoration
- 'There is no tomorrow': Young Orioles know the deal as Rangers put them in 2-0 ALDS hole
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Banned in Iran, a filmmaker finds inspiration in her mother for 'The Persian Version'
- UK veteran who fought against Japan in World War II visits Tokyo’s national cemetery
- U.S. leaders vow support for Israel after deadly Hamas attacks: There is never any justification for terrorism
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Hamas attack on Israel thrusts Biden into Mideast crisis and has him fending off GOP criticism
Ranking
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- College football Week 6 grades: We're all laughing at Miami after the worst loss of year
- U.S. leaders vow support for Israel after deadly Hamas attacks: There is never any justification for terrorism
- Rio de Janeiro’s security forces launch raids in 3 favelas to target criminals
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Drake says he's stepping away from music to focus on health after new album release
- Some in Congress want to cut Ukraine aid and boost Taiwan’s. But Taiwan sees its fate tied to Kyiv’s
- 'I just want her back': Israeli mom worries daughter taken hostage by Hamas militants
Recommendation
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
What we know about the Hamas attack on Israel, and Israel's response in Gaza
Brock Purdy throws 4 TD passes to lead the 49ers past the Cowboys 42-10
AJ Allmedinger wins at Charlotte; Kyle Busch, Bubba Wallace eliminated from NASCAR playoffs
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes bill aimed at limiting the price of insulin
Rio de Janeiro’s security forces launch raids in 3 favelas to target criminals
Gates Foundation funding $40 million effort to help develop mRNA vaccines in Africa in coming years